Professional Engineering for Constructing Professional Portfolios

Question: Discuss about theProfessional Engineering for Constructing Professional Portfolios. Answer: Abstract Professional engineering is the collective of all actions and principles that ensure pure production of products and services through reducing, recycling, and reusing of engineering waste products to have a healthy public life. These engineering wastes result from some problems that require proper strategically engineering methods and framework. The standard frameworks used by engineers are deductive and abdicative of ideas that have the different lifetime in mind, ranging from short, mid to long-term period. Engineers are therefore obligated to control and ensure sustainable environment from the wastes such as mercury through maintaining and balancing the 3 Es that are Ecology, Economy, and Equity. Through the use of the 3 Es and the Maslows Hierarchy of human needs, companies can produce pure, products and services that are satisfying to the customers. Practically, engineers have developed three effective natural engineering technologies used in controlling the e-wastes; theses are bionics, biomimetics, and biomimicry. Professional Engineering Professional engineering is definable as any act that entails planning, designing, composing, evaluating, advising, reporting directing, and supervising that requires the application of engineering principles and concerns to safeguard the life, health, property, economic inters, public welfare and the environment (Ural, 2015).There are different problems faced by engineers that need engineers to steer their solution. Engineers use various formulas in solving the problems, such as problem variations that look at the structure and complexity and representations of the social, historical, and cultural contextual composition of the problem. The Individual Differences comprises the knowledge and the general problem-solving strategies. All these there, when added together, provide a better skill of solving the engineering problem. The problem solving demand an individual to determine the factors monitored and knowledge of the underlying factors. The general problem-solving strategy entails self-confidence motivation and perseverance that follows systematic process such logical, algorithmic, story-based, rule-using, decision making, troubleshooting, diagnosis, case analysis design dilemma. Problem-solving tend to be challenging without a proper framework in solving the issues while with proper structure people tend to develop and create confidence within them. The possible engineering framework assumes that all design is deductive to address all the repetitive types of problems since there is absolute knowledge on the topic. The abductive framework method deduces the solutions from the singular and definite. Without the successful approach to the engineering problems the most of the jobs get compromised; however, most of the skills are not transmitted efficiently to others through training. The training is dividable into short-term, mid-term and long-term. The short training pieces of information tend to lie on the mind memory based on the dialogue. The midterm lies on the conscious memory since it is baseson the logistic analysis while the long term since it situates more on the sub-conscious memory since it is the place where all the things found. A good idea can be lost, from memory and is be avoidable through proper understanding how the memories work. There are two memories that are implicit memory that requires continuous subconscious recall ability and explicit memory that requires recall on the issues that are in demand. The ideas should always be incubated in mind to enable easy retrieval them. Abstraction is the engineering approach that enables the management of complexity by suppressing the secondary elements and by emphasizing the critical elements. Abstraction allows the data represented to manage lower-order elements. The elements are in a classification of in taxonomy, axiomatic and thematic. Professional engineers have the obligation for promoting public welfare and promoting sustainable living by controlling e-Waste through reducing, reusing and recycling of the wastes. About 6.5 tonnes of e-Waste is realized per annum in Europe contains more than 1000 different toxic materials such as beryllium, cadmium, mercury, lead, arsenic and endocrine disruptors. For example, 1 gram of mercury can contaminate about 20 hectare lakes and therefore, it is within the engineers to design disciplines to stop the environmental issues actively. Due to the toxic substance, many countries around 172 came together under Basel Convention to ban the movements of the hazardous wastes across from developed to less developed countries. The bottom line theory contains the 3 Es are ecology, economy, and equity, that aims at having sustainable engineering. The ecological factors ensure that all engineering activities obey the natural laws through treating the wastes to sustain all the species (Eliot Turns, 2011). The process should be both financially and energy viable. The economy ensures that whatever products produced results to maximize profit through conducting a cheaper production method. All the aspects must be assuring equitability among all the employees through having higher earnings. The equitability ensures that there is pure social perspective among all employees and the employees with mutual respect to one another without favor on sexism or racism. The extreme points connect to one another to have a good balance model to have a bearable, sustainable, equitable, and viable production of safe products and services. The safe manufacturing and services emanate from the product service system. A system that aims at adding value to the content of both the product and services that are outcome-oriented service, use-oriented service and result-oriented service as like performed by Xerox US and Hitachi. The companies through the process developed took into account of the satisfaction of the human needs as explained by Maslow's Hierarchy of human needs that are of five levels that are physiological, safety, love/belonging, esteem, and self-actualization. The physiological factors include food, water, sex, sleep, and excretion. The second level which is safety ensures the security of the body, resources, family, and property. The third stage is the love where an individual seeks friendship and intimacy from friends and family members. The fourth stage is the esteem where an individual gains self-esteem, confidence, and respects to one another while the last is the self-actualization where one can accept the facts and morality. Presentation of information is significant in engineering through proper visual skills, verbal skills, textual skills, legibility skills and enduring legacy .An analogy is used in creating and identifying the complexity that is all useful in the practical engineering. The analogy is divided into three different categories that are bionics, biomimetics, and biomimicry.Bionics a word convened by Dr. Jack E. Steele of the United States Air Force is the application of a biological method to engineering and technology, biometric is the transfer of functions from biology to the machine that entails replication by blind copying without insights into the living system. Currently, different items such as robots, military devised and medical engineering is associated with bionics/biometrics biomimicry are definable as the natural systems to solve complex human problems. Biomimicry uses an ecological standard to judge the rightness of our innovations through the use of naturally occurring speci es such as bacteria to aid waste treatment. The natural systems are effective since they use only the existing source of energy which is the sun, has no known concept of waste, promotes symbiosis, and has the most repository of proven designs that are known to human. References Eliot, M., Turns, J. (2011). Constructing Professional Portfolios: Sense-Making and Professional Identity Development for Engineering Undergraduates. Journal Of Engineering Education, 100(4), 630-654. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00030.x Ural, N. (2015). Evaluation of Energy Conservation with Utilization of Marble Waste in Geotechnical Engineering. International Journal Of Waste Resources, 05(04). https://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2252-5211.1000189